on the ruling of the Supreme Court No 3572/2011
is
A single woman of Genoa had a child in adoption of Russian citizenship to Soviet ruling by the Court. The ruling, which had in effect legitimizing the country of issue, by virtue of Law 184, 1983 (with amendments of 1998) had to be transcribed in Italy and then the adoption was to be ratified here. The Juvenile Court of Genoa had considered legitimate and effective adoption, but that decision was appealed by the Attorney General experiencing various levels of courts up to get the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court had ruled, under the Italian law, which subjects individuals may adopt a child but in doing so, he literally said: "Notwithstanding that, as this Court has already pointed out ( Cass. March 18, 2006 No 6078) with reference to the provisions of the above mentioned provisions of Art. 6 of Strasbourg Convention of 1967, the national legislature may well provide, in the particular circumstances of competition, a widening of eligibility for adoption of children by a single person with the legitimizing effects of the adoption. "
This is a serious and alarming because it is not a ruling that affirms the right of access to a single person adopt a child, but the complaint could not do it just because it does not exist in our legal system the legal possibilities, and an invitation to the Italian legislature to take steps in that direction. It even cites a previous content in the Judgement of 18 March 2006 No 6078.
Law 05/04/1983 n. 184 provides that parents, for adoption, should be an indication of the two requirements. The adoption, in contrast to the old regulations also admitted in the interests of the adult (inheritance issues, continuation of the family and so on), is made primarily in the interests of the child.
for this reason that those wishing to obtain an adoption should also correspond to the criteria of morality, equity and fair age. Modern psychology itself, before going to disturb the moral question, wrote a myriad of words on the role of parental male and female, their complementarity and indispensability and the negative consequences caused by the absence of presence, for whatever reason, one of the parents. The training of the child through various stages where the correct presence of both parents is essential for the balance of growth and construction of the subject that he becomes an adult. At the very beginning the child has a natural deep relationship with the mother from which its existence depends, gradually begin a secondment with awareness of surroundings, the father figure will start to have a deeper meaning and constructive; the same parent element will become increasingly emulating the certainty of maternal love and loyalty, all these paths, are not consolidated properly when one or both parents were to fail for any reason. Mandate the adoption of a single 'subvert this natural order of things, to sacrifice what has been written and scientifically established the role properly attended by both parents. From an ethics and morality, and for many of us certainly consistent with Catholic faith, the question becomes how much less worrying as it subverts the natural order of things.
psychology has always been consistent and consistently said the inescapable role of father and mother in the correct growth stages of the child. In the field of psychology there is an advocate against. Indeed, starting with Freud, Melanie Klein, Margaret Mahler Hungarian with the enlightened writings derived from his experience working at the Children's Service of New York State Psychiatric Institute, Eric Leonard Bernstein, known as Eric Berne, the same written by Italian authors such as Angela Maria Di Vita and Piera Brustia on the psychology of parenting, the Di.SA (Department of Anthropological Sciences) aimed at analyzing and strengthening of family ties (one could go on forever) points out the crucial role of parental male and female, necessarily complementary and indispensable, and on diseases that can achieve this dual action where parental TTA is not running or missing. E 'found that the correct
action of both parents is essential for the balance of growth and construction of the subject that he becomes an adult.
action of both parents is essential for the balance of growth and construction of the subject that he becomes an adult.
Stimulating the legislature, and I think this is the worst part of the sentence, to legislate in this regard recalls the sacrifice of the collective consciousness before a vision of the world in a "subjective" (the interest of the single) is daughter of extreme secularism has become a real counter-religion.
There is a Europe that is moving in this direction, most represented by countries like France and Belgium to estimate the natural laws which are obsolete now so strongly protected by the Catholic spirit and our Constitution. The wrath of Cardinal Antonel them is not the rhetoric of opposition, but noted that certain directions are disruptive and contrary to human nature itself. Procreation itself, expecting to make use of both sexes to reach the life, remember that this can only develop properly in the spirit of participation of both the law of love.
But there is also a problem of constitutionality that should not be underestimated because all the rules that our Constitution devotes to the family, children and the person may be in conflict with a law that would allow the adoption of a single. Therefore, even more surprisingly, this "invasion of the field" by a state power which has the sole task of enforcing the law.
personally send a letter to the first Sec. the Court of Cassation with this simple diction "Ecc.ma Supreme Court Sec. First penalty, but the utmost respect and consideration of the work of this Court, as an Italian citizen I do not consider my feelings represented in the ethical-moral judgment No. 3572/2011 in so far as "calling for" the Italian legislature to extend, even in limited cases, the custody of the child to a single person. I believe that the proper and dutiful citizen, democratically and with all due respect, to express its view in relation to such sensitive issues. With deference. Mauro Arias. "
I hope that this initiative will be followed by others.
Source: The popular idea
0 comments:
Post a Comment